Glossary International law
Höfundalög
Also: Icelandic Copyright Act, Höfundalög no. 73/1972
Origin: Lög um höfundarrétt, no. 73/1972, as amended. Icelandic Ministry of Culture, English consolidated text available.
Iceland's copyright statute, originally enacted in 1972 and amended periodically to align with EU directives Iceland imports under the EEA Agreement. The statute is notable for what it does NOT contain: a US-style notice-and-takedown procedure equivalent to the DMCA.
Reviewed
Höfundalög — literally “the author law” — is the principal Icelandic copyright statute. Originally enacted in 1972, it has been amended periodically, most substantively in 2000 (transposing the EU InfoSoc Directive 2001/29/EC under the EEA Agreement) and 2018 (incorporating the EU Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive’s earlier amendments). The substantive copyright protections it grants — economic and moral rights of authors, term of protection, exhaustion doctrine, exceptions for quotation, parody, and education — are broadly comparable to those of any EEA member state.
What the statute does not contain is a transposition of the US Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s notice-and-takedown procedure. The EU E-Commerce Directive 2000/31/EC, which Iceland imports through the EEA Agreement, supplies the closest equivalent — the safe-harbour regime for hosting providers — but the EU directive’s procedural surface is significantly thinner than the DMCA’s. There is no Icelandic equivalent of the DMCA Section 512 affidavit, no equivalent of a DMCA agent registration with the Icelandic copyright authority, and no equivalent of the DMCA’s prescribed counter-notice timeline.
The practical consequence for an offshore-hosting operator is that DMCA-format takedown notices have no procedural standing in Icelandic law. A complainant who wishes to compel removal of content hosted in Iceland must proceed under the substantive provisions of Höfundalög, which means a civil action and a court order — not a self-service form. OffshorePress states this explicitly in the acceptable use policy and in the Iceland jurisdictional dossier: the operator does not process DMCA-format notices, because the law of the operating jurisdiction does not require it to.