Glossary International law
Article 19 ICCPR
Also: ICCPR Article 19, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 19
Origin: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted 1966, in force 1976. UN Treaty Series, vol. 999, p. 171.
The 1966 treaty provision under which freedom of expression — including the right to seek, receive, and impart information in any medium — is guaranteed in international law. It is the textual basis on which the press-freedom tradition the publication writes from grounds itself.
Reviewed
Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights is the textual anchor for freedom of expression in international law. The article guarantees the right “to hold opinions without interference” and the right “to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.” The qualification — paragraph 3 of the article — permits restrictions only where they are provided by law and necessary for respect of the rights or reputations of others, or for the protection of national security, public order, public health or morals.
The treaty is binding on the 174 states that have ratified it, including Iceland (ratified 1979) and Switzerland (ratified 1992). It is not, however, directly enforceable in domestic court in either jurisdiction without implementing legislation; what Article 19 supplies is an interpretive frame and a basis for individual communications to the UN Human Rights Committee under the First Optional Protocol.
For an offshore-hosting operator the article matters in two ways. It is the most-cited basis for the press-freedom obligations that statutes like Iceland’s IMMI instruments and Switzerland’s source-protection regime invoke. And it is the standard against which legal demands that touch hosted journalism — takedown orders, source-disclosure subpoenas, surveillance authorisations — are evaluated when the operator opposes them in court.
The General Comment 34 issued by the Human Rights Committee in 2011 is the authoritative interpretive document. It explicitly extends Article 19 protection to internet-based expression, to whistleblowers, and to journalistic sources, and it is the document the operator’s counsel returns to most frequently when framing the principled basis for non-cooperation with overreaching demands.